The smaller guy usually pays…

About 2 months ago, my vehicle was parked in the designated parking area of a veterinary clinic in Midrand. A security guard working for a company providing reaction services, seemingly responded to a call-out, and reversed into my parked vehicle.

All the necessary paperwork was completed – a report detailing what happened according to myself as well as the security guard, a police report with a case number, and I have copies of it all, which also indicates that the security guard is at fault, by his own confession.

After a week, nothing has happened, so I have decided to contact the company, and follow up what is happening. Some reaction from the powers that be at the company, then silence again. I contact them again, and this time, finally, their insurance company called me, and requested information from me, which I started to gather.

Upon getting the three (3) quotes that their insurance company requested of me, all the panel beaters responded that they are not willing to deal with third party claims, due to reasons ranging from the time it takes to settle third party insurance claims to risks related to quoting on repairs that they did not investigate properly, due to not stripping the vehicle for said types of claims.

Finally, I have given up getting quotes for third party insurance claims, and decided to investigate claiming through my own insurance. I have phoned my insurance company, and of course, this is possible and all, but I will have an excess of R 1500.00 and a premium increase of R 80.00 per month for about 12 months.

I felt that since this incident is not my fault, but the guard’s fault (to his own guilt admission), I should not be held responsible for paying this excess and insurance premium increase, which amounts to a total of about R 2500.00. Of course, this is not a huge amount, but for me, it is a matter of principle.

I have therefore contacted their “big boss” that I wish to claim through my own insurance, and that I would claim only my excess and premium increase from them, but has as of yet received no response from them – it’s been over a week.

Oh, by the way, this “big boss” incidently also made a comment “Is this our fault? If not, tell him to fly a kite!” which, of course, was probably not be supposed to have been included in the correspondence that I have received, but unfortunately for them, it was.

Now – I have just about had it with this situation, so, I am thinking of naming and shaming them on all my blogs, Twitter as well as Facebook. I am running 7 blogs, some of them getting over 2000 visits a day in South Africa alone, so maybe naming and shaming is not such a bad idea.

There are many cases of where “the little guy” kicked the backside of “the big guy”. Soon, I will attempt that…. I just thought I’d be fair and allow them one more chance to rectify this situation before actually posting an update to this post that provide the details of this company.

93000 jobs

We often heard that we want to create 93000 jobs for Mandela day. It is a very noble thought. Ideally, we want everyone in our country to be employed. This will increase the tax userbase, therefore increase the amount of tax collected from the residents of South Africa, and as a direct result, provide more funds to budget to the various service delivery departments of the country. It is as simple as that. So well done for this initiative.

I have a huge concern about the sustainability of those jobs created. Giving someone something that we call a “piece job” or in some cases, a “peace job” is should not be classified as creating a job! Giving a cencus worker a job to count people in the country should not be classified as creating a job. Jobs created should be sustainable. That same person must still have this particular job in 12 months, 2 years or even 10 years, providing that person is was not fired from the job due to misconduct or incompetence, and has not moved on to greener pastures.

I believe that these figures of Government’s efforts to provide full-time jobs should be documented. Not only that the job was created, but what the scope of the job is. Is it a permanent job or a contract position? Is it a sustainable job?

I am not at liberty to say that these figures are not publicised – I simply don’t know – but after some search on this matter, I was unable to find relevant information about this. In this case, clearly, Google was not my friend, nor was the Department of Labor’s website. If you know of some place to get this information, please post a comment, as I am really interested to see what these figures are REALLY like.